The survey contains 3 parts. Region I integrated concerns from socio-group research (ages, amount of education, parity, familial money, job, most recent marital updates, sexual craft, reputation for HPV inoculation, and reputation for irregular cervical disease testing).

Part II made up of 6 questions about the mark ladies who are screened, many years to start, frequency, many years otherwise criteria to end of tests, and methods regarding assessment. Only the members who’d ever heard off HPV create proceed to Area III and this examined information about HPV away from its sort of (oncogenic otherwise non-oncogenic), form of sign and you may prevention.

Ahead of the data, the brand new survey away from part II and region III inside Thai type were contemplated, talked about, and you may revised until opinion one of 20 scientists have been all of the gynecologic oncologists (specific have been people in other parallel studies). The pros rated each of 19 questions since either ‘relevant’ or ‘not relevant’. The thing-level Stuff Legitimacy Directory (I-CVI) is actually determined for every goods, while the Articles Legitimacy List (CVI) try calculated by taking the typical ratio from fourteen questions about understanding of cervical disease assessment and you can 5 questions relating to HPV. Brand new CVI was indeed step one both for elements of the survey (S1 Dining table). The brand new accuracy try checked-out inside 30 feminine with similar characteristic once the members. The new Cronbach’ alpha coefficients into the accuracy was basically 0.819 to own knowledge about cervical cancer tumors screening and 0.907 for knowledge about HPV.

Study collection

Towards the day off booked colposcopy, the analysis assistant provided information of study on the feminine just who met inclusion criteria. The ladies which accessible to take part provided composed informed concur and replied the latest survey individually on their own in advance of continuing so you can colposcopy.

Data gathered for this research was indeed socio-group research (Region I of one’s questionnaire), knowledge of cervical cancer examination (Region II), and experience in HPV (Part III).

Mathematical study

The fresh new answers of knowledge throughout the cervical disease assessment and HPV were reviewed because of the for every goods before https://gorgeousbrides.net/da/dominikanske-brude/ scoring categorization. Correct respond to try scored as 1 while ‘completely wrong and you may being unsure of answer’ try scored 0.

Out-of fourteen concerns out of cervical cancer examination, feminine whose get was indeed ? 10 was in fact randomly classified as the having ‘good knowledge’ otherwise was indeed regarded as with “unhealthy degree”. To own experience with HPV, female whoever respond to are ‘never ever been aware of HPV’ had been excluded on studies regarding HPV studies.

Of 5 concerns, women whose get was basically ? step three was basically regarded as with ‘an excellent knowledge of HPV’ if not because the ‘negative knowledge’. Away from 19 questions, feminine whose score was in fact ? thirteen was indeed categorized given that having ‘a beneficial overall knowledge’ if not due to the fact ‘unhealthy overall knowledge’.

All of the data had been amassed when you look at the an electronic databases and you can analyzed using SPSS V.26.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze demographic studies and you can had been described since number having fee, suggest which have basic deviation or average that have assortment. Brand new connection anywhere between for each adjustable and you will degree get had been analyzed using easy linear regression. Exploratory design was created within the multivariable research along with the parameters possibly connected with the content get. New experienced level of mathematical benefit are an excellent p-property value 0.05 or quicker.

Overall performance

Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>